[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XLink and XForms

• To: "'David Carlisle'" <davidc@n...>
• Subject: RE: XLink and XForms
• From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:47:57 -0400
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <200208301442.PAA01425@p...>

Hi David,

David said:
MathML does not require any linking but allows the use of xlink
simple links in the dtd:

http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/chapter7.html#interf_link

Didier replies:
Thanx David for the info. Now the updated count about the W3C Byzantine
Schism is:
a) using Xlink or allowing its uses as defined in the specs: 2 (SVG,
MathML)
b) not using it: 2 (XHTML, XForm)

Cheers
Didier PH Martin

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XLink and XForms
    • From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>

• References:
  • Re: XLink and XForms
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• Prev by Date: ADMINISTRIVIA: Wondering if I can post ...
• Next by Date: Re: XLink and XForms
• Previous by thread: Re: XLink and XForms
• Next by thread: Re: XLink and XForms
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread