• To: "'Richard Tobin'" <richard@c...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: relying on ordering of sibling XML elements
• From: "Jimmy Cerra" <jc2astro@h...>
• Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 19:47:33 -0400
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <200208031619.RAA23808@r...>
• Organization: University of Pittsburgh, CCAC
• Reply-to: <jc2astro@h...>

> >Question - does "proper" XML document design permit
> >deriving a semantic meaning from the ordering of XML
> >sibling elements?
>
> Yes.
>
> Observe that the Infoset (http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/) describes
> the [children] property of an element as "an ordered list of child
> information items, in document order".  Contrast this with [attributes]
> which is "an unordered set of attribute information items".

MathML ( http://www.w3.org/math ) has many elements (such as the <msup>
element) that depend on document order, for example.

--
Jimmy Cerra

============================================
"my mind is slipping away...
                   ...day by glorious day"
Robin Gorkin
============================================

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: relying on ordering of sibling XML elements
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • Re: relying on ordering of sibling XML elements
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang=""
• Next by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Previous by thread: Re: relying on ordering of sibling XML elements
• Next by thread: RE: relying on ordering of sibling XML elements
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread