[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
• Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 14:01:05 -0400
• In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20020817085345.00bb28e0@m...>
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020816221755.026d73a8@m...><4.3.2.7.2.20020816141558.00e7adb0@m...><000b01c24546$9ef32f80$6401a8c0@didierhome><p04330101b982cad47be1@[192.168.254.4]>

At 08:54 AM 8/17/2002 -0700, Ann Navarro wrote:
>Have you actually read the documents referenced? This comment certainly 
>doesn't indicate so.

         I have. And the "href" issue still seems to be the main 
showstopper that's been stated in explicitly technical terms. A number of 
the other points raised in those references have been addressed here by 
others, but we haven't heard a peep from the XHTML folks as to why "href" 
remains a big issue, giving the amount of other substantive changes in 
XHTML you folks have introduced.

         Like you, I believe that most of the other issues raised are 
clear, and debatable, and solvable without doing all sorts of acrobatics. 
The "href" issue is the only one that I feel is entirely groundless.

--->Ben

• References:
  • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
  • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread