• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
• Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 13:58:04 -0400
• In-reply-to: <003001c245fb$c9f2b6f0$6401a8c0@didierhome>
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020816230611.0249d7a0@m...>

At 10:38 AM 8/17/2002 -0400, Didier PH Martin wrote:
>This is why we should ask from the WG to _explicitly_ state the
>showstoppers and breakdowns they have with such specifications like

         It would actually be nice to see the reasons summarized in a 
coherent, single email to this list...preferably from a representative of 
the XHTML people.

         I don't mind being pointed to archives, but I'd like to see the 
most current thoughts on the subject.

--->Ben

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
  • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by Date: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread