• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 14:43:52 -0400
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020817135114.00aa9e60@m...>

Ben Trafford writes:
> Who cares? Give me a linking spec, and then use it, people!

A closing like this makes me really wonder... hypertext is complex
enough stuff that I think some serious attention to the fit between
specs and application is critically important.

I'll take "theological hand-waving" over "there's a spec, now use it
whether it fits your needs or not" any day, thanks.


-------------
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.com may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether

• Follow-Ups:
  • Tearing the Hyperlink Problem Apart (was Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?)
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by Date: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: Tearing the Hyperlink Problem Apart (was Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread