[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: W3C XFrames - first public WD published

• To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 09:07:58 -0400
• In-reply-to: <003901c23dbe$dbbfb5d0$fe193044@tbp1>
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621ECD@r...>

At 11:02 PM 8/6/2002 -0400, Thomas B. Passin wrote:

>The Zope list just had a thread about problems in the display of its
>interface using some versions of IE, and someone wrote in and said that if
>you modified the DOCTYPE declaration (which was an xhtml-transitional
>doctype), then IE would go into quirks mode and the display problems would
>go away.  My point is that is seems that some else really is using xhtml or
>at least its doctype declaration.

Do you have anything more specific on that? Using XHTML 1.0 *anything* 
that's valid shouldn't produce any glaring problems in any of the major 
browsers more recent versions. (circa 1999 forward)

Ann

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
    • From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
  • Re: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• References:
  • RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Re: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
• Next by Date: Re: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
• Next by thread: Re: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread