[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
• Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 14:54:54 -0400
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-AC536F69B21211D683CE0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020817135659.023548b8@m...>

At 02:53 PM 8/17/2002 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>Given the long and rather tortured history of the XLink spec, it might
>be nice to see a single such coherent email explaining the perspective
>of the XLink WG as well.

         Unfortunately, my experience isn't recent enough to provide such 
an explanation. Where's Eve Maler when you need her? Or Steve DeRose? Or 
Dave Orchard?

         ;^)

--->Ben

• References:
  • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
  • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by Date: Tearing the Hyperlink Problem Apart (was Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?)
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread