[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?

• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Subject: Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
• From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:39:25 -0600
• Cc: AndrewWatt2000@a..., mimasa@w..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: Message from Tim Bray <tbray@t...> of "Sun, 11 Aug 2002 11:04:41 PDT." <3D56A739.5070804@t...>
• Sender: uche.ogbuji@f...

> AndrewWatt2000@a... wrote:
> 
> > Does Steven Pemberton's email 
> > (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0158.html)

Steve Pemberton's e-mail, certainly makes the XLink WG look the guilty party.  
I wonder whether anyone from that WG would deny or explain such arrogant 
behavior.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                                    Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net    http://4Suite.org    http://fourthought.com
Track chair, XML/Web Services One Boston: http://www.xmlconference.com/
Basic XML and RDF techniques for knowledge management, Part 7 - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think12.html
Keeping pace with James Clark - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-jclark.html
Python and XML development using 4Suite, Part 3: 4RDF - http://www-105.ibm.com/developerworks/education.nsf/xml-onlinecourse-bytitle/8A1EA5A2CF4621C386256BBB006F4CEC

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>

• References:
  • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: how would one define credible linking?
• Next by Date: Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
• Previous by thread: Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
• Next by thread: Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread