[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming

• To: xml-dev@l..., "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 12:04:58 -0400
• In-reply-to: <4.2.0.58.20020802110518.013322f8@p...>

8/2/2002 11:17:06 AM, "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> wrote:

>
>I say it's time to kick those bums out. 

Hmmm.  I sortof like  "accept the fact that we are
divergent communities that share certain core mindsets and technologies"
better than "kick the bums out.

>Developers who want concise representations of strongly-typed information 
>should be asking themselves whether verbose textual formats are genuinely 
>compatible with their needs. 

As I argue in the "Keeping ISO 8879 Alive" post, I think there are
plenty of people who accept the InfoSet view of the world but don't
drink the PSVI KoolAid :~)  

 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming
• Next by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
• Previous by thread: Re: Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming
• Next by thread: Re: Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread