[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XML-Schema Help

• To: "John Cowan" <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: RE: XML-Schema Help
• From: "Ranjeet Sonone" <ranjeet@i...>
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 14:24:49 -0700
• Cc: "Doug Rudder" <drudder@d...>,"Dave Yancey" <dyancey1@h...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcJFaUdqSekJPFLRSuWqRBeRElYQdQAAdolA
• Thread-topic: XML-Schema Help

I think even the xmlschema implementation would be fine for an LL(1)
parser, as it can resolve the following production by lookahead:

A -> b | c | bc

a simple case with lookahead of 1.

The grammar that Dave needs fits in this class.
regards,
-ranjeet


-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@r...]
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 2:07 PM
To: Ranjeet Sonone
Cc: John Cowan; Doug Rudder; Dave Yancey; xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  XML-Schema Help


Ranjeet Sonone scripsit:

> What do you mean by "in parallel"?

That is to say, without backtracking, at least in the Jing
implementation
of validation.  Of course, a backtracking implementation is also
possible.

-- 
John Cowan
        jcowan@r...
                I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML-Schema Help
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML-Schema Help
• Next by Date: Re: XML-Schema Help
• Previous by thread: Re: XML-Schema Help
• Next by thread: Re: XML-Schema Help
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread