[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML-Schema Help

• To: ranjeet@i... (Ranjeet Sonone)
• Subject: Re: XML-Schema Help
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 17:30:26 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: jcowan@r... (John Cowan), drudder@d... (Doug Rudder), dyancey1@h... (Dave Yancey), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <EFBAE6044AC0CD41981E01582A1E94AB302357@a...> from "Ranjeet Sonone" at Aug 16, 2002 02:24:49 PM

Ranjeet Sonone scripsit:

> I think even the xmlschema implementation would be fine for an LL(1)
> parser, as it can resolve the following production by lookahead:

SGML DTDs disallow lookahead, and so do XML DTDs, and so do W3C XML Schemas.
RELAX NG dethrones the past and the Glushkin automaton, and uses a
novel technique to make the parsing of ambiguous grammars efficient.

-- 
John Cowan                              jcowan@r...
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              http://www.reutershealth.com
Thor Heyerdahl recounts his attempt to prove Rudyard Kipling's theory
that the mongoose first came to India on a raft from Polynesia.
        --blurb for _Rikki-Kon-Tiki-Tavi_

• References:
  • RE: XML-Schema Help
    • From: "Ranjeet Sonone" <ranjeet@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML-Schema Help
• Next by Date: Announcement: New W3C specifications of XQuery and XPath2
• Previous by thread: RE: XML-Schema Help
• Next by thread: RE: XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread