• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 23:59:43 -0400
• References: <200208220045.UAA15481@m...><200208220142.g7M1gD332408@d...>

[Joe English]
>
> The main reason for using namespace names in a vocabulary
> is so that it can be with other vocabularies to form a document
> type [*].  On the other hand, if a document type contains only
> words from a single vocabulary designed specifically for that
> document type and for no others, there's no reason to use
> namespaces at all.
>
>
Unless someone else discovers a clever use for your vocabulary that you had
not foreseen.

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: XForms: New & Last WD
• Next by Date: Re: ANN: XML Schema of measurement units
• Previous by thread: Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM
• Next by thread: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread