• To: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 15:07:19 -0400
• In-reply-to: <000701c24557$4f939ae0$6401a8c0@didierhome>
• References: <4.3.2.7.2.20020816141558.00e7adb0@m...>

At 03:01 PM 8/16/2002 -0400, Didier PH Martin wrote:
>. Ann, this document is
>needed, even if reasons has been stated on this list, no official
>document representing the official WG position has been posted.


Actually there has been, via last call comments, and links to those have 
been given within this discussion (probably 3-4 days ago if you want to 
check the archives)

Ann

• References:
  • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML, hypertext
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread