[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 23:27:31 -0400
• In-reply-to: <007501c23a93$73f78500$0201a8c0@n...>
• References: <3D4ADF5D.40E34606@k...><3D4AC377.B49E7BB4@k...><200208021640.g72Ge3rR069573@c...><200208021922.g72JM9307382@d...><200208022107.g72L7X308103@d...><3D4AFA99.1050903@t...><4.2.0.58.20020802222011.014304d8@p...>

At 10:14 PM 8/2/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>ok i'll bite:
>
>the URI reference identifies the namespace,
>in other words
>the namespace is being named

And that buys us what if the URI is most easily resolved to a porn site?

(Deliberately perverse, yes.)

Naming a namespace is _nearly_ as exciting as identifying a resource which 
is a thing that can be identified.

If the URI can be resolved to a RDDL document which purports to be a 
representation of the namespace, I'm happy to buy your argument.  If it 
doesn't or doesn't have to, I think I'm off the train completely at this point.


Simon St.Laurent
"Every day in every way I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: Kian-Tat Lim <ktl@k...>
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: Kian-Tat Lim <ktl@k...>
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: Mike Brown <mike@s...>
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by Date: Re: Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: Markup pe rspective not code)
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread