• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 14:48:50 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3D5BF59E.79BE02B5@p...>

Paul Prescod writes:
> That sounds great from a language lawyer point of view but if I'm
> making a commercial software application, like XMetaL or Google, *how
> do I recognize links* in a vocabulary-neutral manner?

Opera's CSS approach sounds pretty good to me, especially since XMetal
already speaks CSS and Google would have access to CSS for pages
deployed on the Web.

Just one possibility, of course.
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Shane McCarron <shane@a...>
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML Schema for large database
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread