• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
• From: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@c...>
• Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 08:52:04 -0500 (CDT)
• In-reply-to: <002701c23e15$11261920$fe193044@tbp1>

Let me see if I have this correct:

   1.  To place two documents next to each other, you specify

OLD WAY (framesets)			NEW WAY (XFrames)
<frameset cols="50%,*">			<row>
   <frame />				   <frame />
   <frame />				   <frame />
</frameset>				</row>

   2. To put two documents one above the other, you specify

OLD WAY (framesets)			NEW WAY (XFrames)
<frameset rows="50%,*">			<column>
   <frame />				   <frame />
   <frame />				   <frame />
</frameset>				</column>

Out of habit, I have gotten used to seeing two frames next
to each other as two columns; now it is one row with two frames.
I have gotten used to seeing two frames above one another as
two separate rows; now it is a column with two frames in it.

I realize that this now makes things more consistent with table notation,
but you think this will confuse anyone else, or even bother them for more
than a millisecond?

-- 
J. David Eisenberg  http://catcode.com/

• References:
  • Re: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Reality check needed ....
• Next by Date: RE: using avt's outside xslt
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
• Next by thread: RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread