• To: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: patterns vs. identifiers
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:45:05 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-E8E577F0B44811D69F470003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
• Organization: Propylon
• Reply-to: <bill.dehora@p...>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] 
>
> Then I have to ask "which humans"?
> 
> XML seems aimed at a much larger group, to say the least.


Go and look at n-triples, then the diagrams in the RDF specs, then
RDF-XML. These are all RDF. When you're done, come back and tell me
where the readability problem in RDF sits. Then I'll send you off to
look at UML diagrams and the XMI.

regards,
Bill de hÓra

..
Propylon
www.propylon.com 

 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: patterns vs. identifiers
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: patterns vs. identifiers
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: patterns vs. identifiers
• Next by Date: Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
• Previous by thread: Re: patterns vs. identifiers
• Next by thread: RE: patterns vs. identifiers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread