• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Reality check needed ....
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 23:05:47 +0000
• In-reply-to: <001601c23df2$b33e4de0$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
• References: <001e01c23dec$60063170$1fc8c8c8@mitchum> <001601c23df2$b33e4de0$6401a8c0@pcukmka>

"Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...> wrote:

| I had assumed it was obvious to everyone in this community that names,
| in general, should not carry implicit information about the objects they
| refer to: or at any rate, that there are better ways of representing
| this information than packing it into three bytes of the name.

Such as some number of bytes ending with a colon?  Mumble.

• References:
  • RE: Reality check needed ....
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
  • RE: Reality check needed ....
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML parsers acceptance
• Next by Date: Re: patterns vs. identifiers
• Previous by thread: Re: Reality check needed ....
• Next by thread: Re: Reality check needed ....
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread