• To: "'Ann Navarro'" <ann@w...>
• Subject: RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
• From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:47:06 +0200
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20020808091555.00a88270@m...>

>I suppose the debug process could arguably be harder -- if you debug 
>by validation and not sight, that should eliminate most of it.

Yeah, that's true, although I think that egregious bugs, not to mention
hard to resolve, turn out to be bugs thrown by integration of various
technologies/standards, i.e. xhtml with css1, with ecmascript etc. And
this still seems to be more of an art than science to me.

• References:
  • RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
• Next by Date: Re: ADMINISTRIVIA: list server / archive problems?
• Previous by thread: RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
• Next by thread: RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread