• To: seairth@s... (Seairth Jacobs)
• Subject: Re: Global/Local attributes
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 10:21:18 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l... (xml-dev)
• In-reply-to: <000b01c23a28$a1129e50$6600a8c0@seairthlaptop> from "Seairth Jacobs" at Aug 02, 2002 09:29:28 AM

Seairth Jacobs scripsit:

> I agree.  It is a radical change.  However, the reasoning behind it was that
> you currently have no way of using attributes defined in the default
> namespace, which seems counter-intuitive to me.

Nothing stops you from declaring a prefix which is equivalent to the
current default namespace, and using that for attributes.
-- 
John Cowan                              <jcowan@r...>
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              http://www.reutershealth.com
Unified Gaelic in Cyrillic script!
        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Celticonlang

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Global/Local attributes
    • From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Global/Local attributes
    • From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
• Next by Date: Re: Global/Local attributes
• Previous by thread: Re: Global/Local attributes
• Next by thread: Re: Global/Local attributes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread