[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming

• To: clbullar@i... ("Bullard, Claude L (Len)")
• Subject: Re: Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 17:30:11 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: simonstl@s... ('Simon St.Laurent'), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B751@HQ5> from "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" at Aug 02, 2002 04:24:19 PM

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit:

> The core should be the absolute smallest set of features 
> that guarantee global interoperability.

That would be plain text.

-- 
John Cowan                              <jcowan@r...>
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              http://www.reutershealth.com
Unified Gaelic in Cyrillic script!
        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Celticonlang

• References:
  • RE: Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Markup perspective not code (was RE: Re: URIs, concrete)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Previous by thread: RE: Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming
• Next by thread: RE: Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread