• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: quarantining namespaces
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:57:09 +0200
• Organization: Expway
• References: <r01050300-1015-36AD9B90ACAA11D69D4E0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
• Reply-to: robin.berjon@e...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530

Simon St.Laurent wrote:
 > We've had a few fine moments come out of the discussion, though RDDL
 > is the only solid result I can think of - and it (alas) hasn't taken
 > the world by storm either.

I'm not seeing much advocacy for it either, it won't "just happen". I
think people also need to see examples of it put to use beyond the nice
idea situation.

 > Might it make sense to move namespace discussions to a forum of their
 > own?

I fully agree, it's well past time we tried to put that to rest once and
for all.

 > This proved painfully useful during the relative URI reference
 > discussion, though I think that list has been shut down to
 > archive-only. (I can't raise http://lists.w3.org today; someone please
 > correct me if I'm wrong.)

As far as I can tell it's still available, though it appears to only be
used for spam and questions headed the wrong way.

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
Research Engineer, Expway

• References:
  • quarantining namespaces
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: rng 2 xmi
• Next by Date: Re: XLink 2.0 Requirements
• Previous by thread: quarantining namespaces
• Next by thread: how to se the transformed output...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread