RE: Default namespace (was Re: URIs, concrete (was Re:Un-askth
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Aaron Skonnard wrote: > > > > Well, that is one application of the default namespace. But I would > get > > > very tired of creating new mono-namespace (or nearly so) documents > > > without this particular minimization. > > > > > > > J. David Eisenberg http://catcode.com/: > > > > Amen to that. I would hate to have to update all my XHTML files with > > a prefix on every single tag, no matter if the prefix were only one > > letter long. > > So let XSLT do it for you. > > -aaron > http://staff.develop.com/aarons > <sarcasm type="uncalled-for">Oh, joy.</sarcasm> If I have to create separate files, it's yet another set of files to keep track of. More important, it's yet another step between my ideas and the reader's screen/page. If the transform happens dynamically on the server side, it's an extra load on the server. In both cases, it consumes more bandwidth. Minor, that is, except for heavily trafficked sites which need to keep bandwidth expenses to a minimum. I am perfectly willing to admit that the preceding is a narrow, selfish position, which does not take the "long view" of XML's True Purpose. -- J. David Eisenberg http://catcode.com/
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format