RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
Richard Tobin wrote: > Simon knows they don't have the same attributes. He thinks the > namespaces spec should have been different, so that they did have the > same attributes. He's knows the spec isn't going to be changed, so he > thinks that vocabulary designers and applications should take the > responsibility of always giving them the same interpretation. I don't see this as a best-practice. Everyone seems to agree that you probably want to avoid situations where a local (unqualified) and global (qualified) attribute might be used on the same element - that's the best practice imo. Saying you're always going to give them the same interpretation defeats the purpose of namespaces and just confuses those that already understand how they work. -aaron http://staff.develop.com
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format