XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)

Shopping cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

To: jelks@j..., xml-dev@l...
Subject: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 02:26:58 EDT

In a message dated 18/08/2002 22:15:44 GMT Daylight Time, jelks@j... writes:

XHTML 2.0 seems to be the one bright light amongst the maze of W3C specs
currently in vogue.

Really??

Can you expound on why you believe XHTML 2.0 to be a "bright light"?

For example ... For whom? To achieve what?

Andrew Watt

Follow-Ups:
- RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
  - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
- Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

Prev by Date: Re: linking, 80/20
Next by Date: Re: WXS acronym?
Previous by thread: RE: XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear
Next by thread: Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks

W3C Member