• To: simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent)
• Subject: Re: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:11:28 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-92D02F6BAFC011D683CE0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]> from "Simon St.Laurent" at Aug 14, 2002 04:01:08 PM

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:

> No, John.  I want formats that are actually useful, rather than
> over-featured megaliths that address all questions by piling on
> ridiculous internal links in forms which are hideously over-complex.

Added to my .sig file.

> I think you've demonstrated that quite completely with this disgusting
> mess, and left me wondering yet again why the Infoset was even vaguely a
> good idea in the first place.

Just because I'm the editor doesn't make me an enthusiast for it, believe me.

> Fortunately, my current reading of Norm's suggestion doesn't require
> this kind of acrobatics.

No more it does.

-- 
De plichten van een docent zijn divers,         John Cowan
die van het gehoor ook.                         jcowan@r...
      --Edsger Dijkstra                         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

• References:
  • Re: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Next by thread: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread