[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Architectural Forms revival?

• To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Subject: Re: Architectural Forms revival?
• From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 21:29:52 -0600
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: Message from "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...> of "Mon, 26 Aug 2002 03:26:19 +1000." <002d01c24c5c$86540270$4bc8a8c0@A...>
• Sender: uche.ogbuji@f...

> Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...> wrote:
> 
> | My main problem with [the AF approach] has always been that it involves 
> | processing that is not available to XML generically. [...] the best 
> | solution to this whole matter [might] have been to hypnotize the XML 1.0 
> | folks to add into XML 1.0 the ability to [re-map] elements and attributes. 
> 
> This is one of the intended possible capabilities of ISO Schematron, b.t.w.  
> Use the role attribute to decorate elements.

[SNIP]

This looks *very* promising, I must say.  I'm still stuck on Schematron 1.5.  
Maybe it's time to give the ISO version a hard look, draft that it is.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                                    Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net    http://4Suite.org    http://fourthought.com
Track chair, XML/Web Services One Boston: http://www.xmlconference.com/
Basic XML and RDF techniques for knowledge management, Part 7 - 
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think12.html
Keeping pace with James Clark - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/libra
ry/x-jclark.html
Python and XML development using 4Suite, Part 3: 4RDF - 
http://www-105.ibm.com/developerworks/education.nsf/xml-onlinecourse-bytitle/8A
1EA5A2CF4621C386256BBB006F4CEC

• References:
  • Re: Architectural Forms revival?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: patterns vs. identifiers
• Next by Date: Re: patterns vs. identifiers
• Previous by thread: Re: Architectural Forms revival?
• Next by thread: Re: linking, 80/20
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread