[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
• From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 00:08:27 -0400
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20020821092312.01e6bd90@m...>

Ann Navarro wrote:

> <personal opinion, not representative of the WG>
> 
> XHTML uses namespaces because it has to. Just as any other 
> spec produced these days has to.

"Ay," Hamlet whined metaphysically, "There's the rub."


/Jelks

• References:
  • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer?
• Next by Date: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Previous by thread: global markup (was Re: XHTML 2.0, death of XLink)
• Next by thread: RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread