• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: linking, 80/20
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 02:33:00 +0000
• In-reply-to: <E17jxy3-0001CA-00@c...>
• References: <camimug0tli6u8rd6ehdn0vroc9562q4g6@4...> <004601c24e10$a735cf40$6501a8c0@blackie> <trsnmus815kgkd0l4gvmccp518dq1nt73b@4...> <E17jxy3-0001CA-00@c...>

"Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@a...> wrote:
| On Tuesday 27 August 2002 22:59, Arjun Ray wrote:

|> The really bad idea I see coming sometimes is things like href_1, href_2... 
|> It has just the right touch of "sufficient ingenuity" to punt on the real 
|> problem.
| 
| Hey, I thought that's what was the primary unwritten design goal of XML? :-)

To encourage as much Sufficient Ingeniuty as possible, you mean?

The cynic in me agrees with you.

• References:
  • Re: linking, 80/20
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
  • RE: linking, 80/20
    • From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
  • Re: linking, 80/20
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
  • Re: linking, 80/20
    • From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: W3C XML Schema public home page updated: new tools
• Next by Date: Linking global context
• Previous by thread: Re: linking, 80/20
• Next by thread: Re: linking, 80/20
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread