• To: simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent)
• Subject: Re: Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: Markup
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 17:17:39 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <4.2.0.58.20020802165120.0168c2f0@p...> from "Simon St.Laurent" at Aug 02, 2002 04:52:31 PM

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:
> 
> I've started to do some refactoring in a J2ME parser I'm writing.  The API 
> (though not yet the parser) is available at:
> http://simonstl.com/projects/tam/

Make sure to mention that TAM parsers aren't XML 1,0 conformant processors.
primarily because they can't be counted on to process the internal subset.

-- 
John Cowan                                   jcowan@r...
        "You need a change: try Canada"  "You need a change: try China"
                --fortune cookies opened by a couple that I know

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: Markup
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: Markup perspective not code)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: Markup pe rspective not code)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
• Previous by thread: Re: Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: Markup perspective not code)
• Next by thread: Re: Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: Markup
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread