• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
• From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• Date: 21 Aug 2002 19:08:01 +0200
• In-reply-to: <200208211517.g7LFHP327250@d...>
• References: <m3k7mkr0qn.fsf@p...><r01050300-1015-17D22988B37F11D69F470003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]><m3r8gu1phj.fsf@p...><3D616D33.6090801@h...><200208211517.g7LFHP327250@d...>
• Sender: larsga@p...
• User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1

* Joe English
| 
| This sounds like a compelling use case for XLink "extended" links:
| you could link to a particular frame configuration by providing one
| locator for the frameset plus a locator for the content of each
| frame.

I'm not so sure. It would be just as easy to do it without XLink,
wouldn't it?

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
ISO SC34/WG3, OASIS GeoLang TC        <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >

• References:
  • Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
  • Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
  • Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
    • From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
  • Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
• Next by Date: Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM
• Previous by thread: Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
• Next by thread: Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread