• To: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 08:04:23 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-B0C7CE46B08311D683CE0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
• Organization: Propylon
• Reply-to: <bill.dehora@p...>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] 
>
> Norm Walsh writes:
> >
> > Surely that way lies madness...
> 
> I dunno.  I've found CSS syntax pretty agreeable stuff, not 
> just "quasi-structured".  It may be a different markup from 
> pointy brackets, but it's hardly hieroglyphics.


Except for the cascading bit.

regards,
Bill de hÓra
..
Propylon
www.propylon.com 

 

• References:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by Date: RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread