[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: constructive (was RE: Markup perspective not co

• To: 'Dare Obasanjo' <dareo@m...>
• Subject: RE: constructive (was RE: Markup perspective not code)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 13:14:30 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

ebXML last I heard.  Jon and others before and after have said 
that more time should be devoted to developing DTDs and Schemas. 
That is where the XML rubber meets the coding road:  
sharing definitions and documenting semantics.  Then 
implementing these.  That first part is particularly daunting 
work, but getting it right makes all the difference to how 
many doovers one suffers in the second part.   So XML really 
does need good tools for the discovery phase of getting 
the requirements right, the negotiation phase of getting 
the requirements documented, and the implementation phase 
of making code that meets the tests documented in the 
requirements.  One can skip steps but results vary and 
even done well, it is still a calculated risk at best. 
VRML is a good example of doing it right but getting 
the market timing wrong.  Risks are to be managed, but 
they can't be eliminated.   Socialism tries to ignore 
this, but capitalism depends on it.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:dareo@m...]

Maybe it's because I don't follow Java that closely any more vut can someone tell me exactly what Bosak is doing? Is this JAXB or something else? 

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by Date: XML APIs - What's next?
• Previous by thread: Re: constructive (was RE: Markup perspective not code)
• Next by thread: RE: browsers that support XSL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread