[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature

• To: tbray@t... (Tim Bray)
• Subject: Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 14:14:54 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3D63D550.4090904@t...> from "Tim Bray" at Aug 21, 2002 11:00:48 AM

Tim Bray scripsit:

> I'm on the developer's side.  Looking back, the namespace of unqualified 
> attributes is just a goof in the namespaces REC.  I wonder if there's 
> any chance of fixing it?

I doubt it.

I think the Namespace REC got this right: the point of namespaced attributes
is for the equivalent of attribute architectures, and they just aren't the
same thing as plain ol' element-local attributes.

-- 
Not to perambulate              || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
    the corridors               || http://www.reutershealth.com
during the hours of repose      || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    in the boots of ascension.  \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel

• References:
  • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM
• Next by Date: URIs and XML Vocabularies As Code Systems (WAS RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature)
• Previous by thread: Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM
• Next by thread: Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread