• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: P2P and URIs
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:54:28 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3D590AB2.C86A958@p...>

8/13/2002 9:33:38 AM, Paul Prescod <paul@p...> wrote:


>
>It isn't Web architecture if it doesn't use obey the constraints
>discussed here:
>
> * http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Overview.html
>
>and here:
>
> * http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
>
>and here:
>
> * http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/top.htm

Uhh, only the TAG findings can be considered authoritative,
and they don't constrain a whole lot at the moment. 
The design issues are clearly the Director's personal vision,
and Dr. Fielding's dissertation has no normative status
whatsoever, as much as one can appreciate its clarity
of vision.

Just my personal, non-authoritative, opinion, of course.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: P2P and URIs
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • Re: P2P and URIs
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
• Next by Date: RE: Comparable considered necessary
• Previous by thread: Re: P2P and URIs
• Next by thread: Re: P2P and URIs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread