• To: <AndrewWatt2000@a...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
• From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
• Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 08:47:00 -0500
• References: <f3.1f45acab.2a84eada@a...>

> There are many more questions which could be posed about the place of
> XLink/XPointer and XHTML links. In the first instance it might be useful
to
> know why the XHTML WG is taking this approach and if this potentially
duplic
> ate functionality makes sense to the TAG.

This same discussion has been raging on a couple of other lists (XHTML-L
included). But, for the most part XHTML-L was told that the group would be
coming out with a new note that explained all of this. We are all waiting
with baited breath...

Cheers

Jeff Rafter
Defined Systems
http://www.defined.net
XML Development and Developer Web Hosting

• References:
  • XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: RE: Multidimensional XML
• Next by Date: RE: Multidimensional XML
• Previous by thread: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
• Next by thread: Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread