XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - January, 2003

• RE: SAX Parser and Attribute Normalization, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: SAX Parser and Attribute Normalization, Karl Waclawek
• SAX Parser and Attribute Normalization, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: SAX Parser and Attribute Normalization, jcowan
• XML Editors supporting change tracking (redlining etc.), Sean McGrath
• Re: Are There URIs in Heaven?, AndrewWatt2000
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Are There URIs in Heaven?, Chris Wilper
    • Re: Are There URIs in Heaven?, Tim Bray
      • Re: Are There URIs in Heaven?, John Cowan
  • RE: Are There URIs in Heaven?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Are There URIs in Heaven?, Doug Rudder
  • RE: Are There URIs in Heaven?, Jeffrey Winter
  • RE: Are There URIs in Heaven?, Chris Wilper
• Are There URIs in Heaven?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • The patron saints of XML WAS: Are There URIs in Heaven?, Mike Fitzgerald
• Re: Blaming the programmers (was Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as ..., AndrewWatt2000
• Questions on Initializing Parameters for XSL, Richard
  • Re: Questions on Initializing Parameters for XSL, Jeni Tennison
• RE: Blaming the programmers (was Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: combining malfunctioning, evil adult as XML with Elliot Rusty Harald, James Governor
• Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services, Mike Champion
  • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services, Rich Salz
    • RE: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services, Cavnar-Johnson, John
      • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services, Rich Salz
      • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services, Mark Baker
      • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services, Rich Salz
      • RE: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services, Cavnar-Johnson, John
      • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services, Mike Champion
      • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services, Mike Champion
      • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services, Alaric B. Snell
      • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services, Bill Kearney
      • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold in Heaven Talking to God, Dave Winer
      • RE: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services, Bill Kearney
  • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services, John Cowan
• RE: XincaML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: XML in Real Life, AndrewWatt2000
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML in Real Life, Jeff Lowery
    • Re: XML in Real Life, Bill Kearney
• XML in Real Life, John Cowan
  • Re: XML in Real Life, Alaric B. Snell
  • Re: XML in Real Life, Andrzej Jan Taramina
    • Re: Re: XML in Real Life, John Cowan
      • Re: Re: XML in Real Life, Andrzej Jan Taramina
  • RE: XML in Real Life, Michael Kay
• find and replace using xpath, Wannheden, Knut
  • Re: find and replace using xpath, Jeff Greif
• ANN: Modular Namespaces (MNS), James Clark
• Anchor tags in a HTML file having no file extension, V, Sushma (Indsys)
• RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Simon St.Laurent
    • RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Seairth Jacobs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Andrew Layman
    • Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Seairth Jacobs
      • Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, m batsis
      • Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Richard Tobin
      • Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Bryce K. Nielsen
      • Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Tim Bray
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
  • RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Sean McGrath
  • RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Blaming the programmers (was Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML), Seairth Jacobs
      • Re: Blaming the programmers (was Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Blaming the programmers, Norman Walsh
  • RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Greg Alvord
  • RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Jeff Lowery
• malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Seairth Jacobs
    • Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, James Clark
      • Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Alaric B. Snell
      • RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Don Park
      • Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML, Seairth Jacobs
• RE: Linguistic Philosophy Reading and URI Related Reading Material, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: Linguistic Philosophy Reading and URI Related Readi ng Material, Simon St.Laurent
• XincaML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: XincaML, Rick Jelliffe
• RE: catch (was Re: RDDL and WSDL), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: catch (was Re: RDDL and WSDL), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• OFTOPIC: Talks by John Sowa, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: RDDL and WSDL, Chris Wilper
  • RE: RDDL and WSDL, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RDDL and WSDL, Chris Wilper
  • RE: RDDL and WSDL, Doug Ransom
• IDEALLIANCE ANNOUNCES XTN: XML TRAINING NETWORK, Elledge, Marion
• [ANN] XMLDistilled Editor Pro v2.0 Beta, jhughes
• RE: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (was Re: many-to-many), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (was Re: many-to-many), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Multiple include, PHDB _
  • Re: Multiple include, Rick Taylor
  • Re: Multiple include, Henry S. Thompson
• RDDL and WSDL, Doug Ransom
  • Re: RDDL and WSDL, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: RDDL and WSDL, Mike Champion
      • catch (was Re: RDDL and WSDL), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: catch (was Re: RDDL and WSDL), John Cowan
      • Re: catch (was Re: RDDL and WSDL), Simon St.Laurent
• RE: URI Related Reading Material, Jeffrey Winter
• Linguistic Philosophy Reading and URI Related Reading Material, James Governor
• Multiple include, PHDB _
  • Re: Multiple include, Rick Taylor
  • Re: Multiple include, Henry S. Thompson
• Physics Markup Language research, Vaccariello, John
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Physics Markup Language research, SISCO
• RE: xslt, Kielen, Agnes
• xslt, RANGA BABU
  • RE: xslt, Stephen M. Wong
  • RE: xslt, Mike Fitzgerald
• XCBF Committee Specification - Public Review, Karl F. Best
• Re: What is a resource? (Was: many-to-many), jeffrafter@d...
  • New WDs which discuss URIs and resources was Re: What is a resource? (Was: many-to-many), Jonathan Borden
    • W3C mailinglists which discuss URIs and resources was Re: What is a resource? (Was: many-to-many), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: W3C mailinglists which discuss URIs and resources was Re: What is a resource? (Was: many-to-many), Simon St.Laurent
      • URI Related Reading Material, Leigh Dodds
      • Re: URI Related Reading Material, Jeff Rafter
      • RE: URI Related Reading Material, Leigh Dodds
• [slightly off topic] RFC.net is back, Alaric Snell
• Re: What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many), Jonathan Borden
  • Re: What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many), Mark Baker
    • Re: What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many), Mark Baker
      • RE: What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many), bryan
      • Re: What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many), Jonathan Borden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RDF resources (was: many-to-many), Jeff Lowery
  • Re: RDF resources (was: many-to-many), John Cowan
• Re: Re: Binary Encoding using Base64, Rich Salz
• Re: Is SAF dead?, Eric van der Vlist
• JITTs related article, Patrick Durusau
• Binary Encoding using Base64, Jason Brown
  • Re: Binary Encoding using Base64, Andrzej Jan Taramina
    • Re: Re: Binary Encoding using Base64, Rich Salz
      • Re: Re: Binary Encoding using Base64, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: Binary Encoding using Base64, Rich Salz
      • Re: Re: Binary Encoding using Base64, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: Binary Encoding using Base64, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Re: Binary Encoding using Base64, John Cowan
      • Re: Re: Binary Encoding using Base64, Andrzej Jan Taramina
      • Re: Re: Binary Encoding using Base64, Karl Waclawek
• Is SAF dead?, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: Is SAF dead?, Jonathan Robie
• What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many), AndrewWatt2000
• [announce] XMLSPY 5 Release 3 now available, Larry E. Kim
• dtd:how to limit the depth of an element, Hubert Holtz
• Ann: Examplotron 0.5, Eric van der Vlist
• RE: Validating stylesheet, Doug Ransom
• filters.., anna makri
• Processing instruction guidelines, Jeni Tennison
  • Re: Processing instruction guidelines, Joe English
    • Re: Processing instruction guidelines, John Cowan
  • Re: Processing instruction guidelines, B. Tommie Usdin
  • Re: Processing instruction guidelines, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Processing instruction guidelines, Eric van der Vlist
  • RE: Processing instruction guidelines, Michael Kay
    • RE: Processing instruction guidelines, Elliotte Rusty Harold
    • Re: Processing instruction guidelines, Joe English
  • Re: Processing instruction guidelines, G. Ken Holman
    • Re: Processing instruction guidelines, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: Processing instruction guidelines, G. Ken Holman
  • Re: Processing instruction guidelines, Norman Walsh
    • Re: Processing instruction guidelines, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: Processing instruction guidelines, Norman Walsh
  • Re: Processing instruction guidelines, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Processing instruction guidelines, Bob DuCharme
• Writing Encrypted XML to a File, Senthilkumar Rajasekharan
  • Re: Writing Encrypted XML to a File, Rohit Mital
    • Re: Writing Encrypted XML to a File, Rich Salz
• RE: many-to-many, Jeffrey Winter
  • RE: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: many-to-many, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: many-to-many, Uche Ogbuji
  • RE: many-to-many, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: many-to-many, Joe English
  • RE: many-to-many, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: many-to-many, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: many-to-many, Miles Sabin
  • RE: many-to-many, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: many-to-many, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: many-to-many, Miles Sabin
  • RE: many-to-many, Jeff Lowery
    • Re: many-to-many, Uche Ogbuji
    • RE: many-to-many, Ian Graham
    • Re: many-to-many, Tim Bray
      • Re: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: many-to-many, Tim Bray
      • Re: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: many-to-many, Tim Bray
      • Re: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: many-to-many, Julian Reschke
      • RE: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: many-to-many, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: many-to-many, Tim Bray
      • Re: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: many-to-many, John Cowan
      • Re: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: many-to-many, John Cowan
      • Re: many-to-many, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: many-to-many, Miles Sabin
      • Re: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: many-to-many, John Cowan
      • Re: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: many-to-many, Miles Sabin
      • Re: many-to-many, Tim Bray
      • Re: many-to-many, Miles Sabin
      • Re: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: many-to-many, Miles Sabin
      • Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (was Re: many-to-many), Mike Champion
      • Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (wasRe: many-to-many), Mike Champion
      • Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction?, Miles Sabin
      • Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction?, Paul Prescod
      • Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction?, Miles Sabin
      • Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction?, Paul Prescod
      • Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (was Re: many-to-many), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (wasRe: many-to-many), Mike Champion
      • Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction?(was Re: many-to-many), Paul Prescod
      • Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (wasRe: many-to-many), Mike Champion
      • Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (was Re: many-to-many), Mark Baker
      • Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (wasRe: many-to-many), Mike Champion
      • Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction?(was Re: many-to-many), Paul Prescod
      • Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (wasRe: many-to-many), Mike Champion
      • Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (wasRe: many-to-many), W. E. Perry
      • Re: many-to-many, Tim Bray
      • Re: many-to-many, Miles Sabin
      • Re: many-to-many, Mark Baker
      • Re: many-to-many, Miles Sabin
      • Re: many-to-many, Mark Baker
      • Re: many-to-many, Mike Champion
      • Re: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: many-to-many, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: many-to-many, Miles Sabin
      • Re: many-to-many, Mark Baker
      • Re: many-to-many, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: many-to-many, John Cowan
      • Re: many-to-many, Miles Sabin
  • RE: many-to-many, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: many-to-many, Jeff Lowery
    • RE: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: many-to-many, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: many-to-many, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: many-to-many, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: many-to-many, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: many-to-many, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: many-to-many, Jeff Lowery
    • Re: many-to-many, John Cowan
    • Re: many-to-many, Mark Baker
  • RE: many-to-many, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: many-to-many, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: many-to-many, Jeff Lowery
    • Re: many-to-many, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: many-to-many, John Cowan
    • Re: many-to-many, Uche Ogbuji
    • Re: many-to-many, Jonathan Borden
  • RE: many-to-many, Jeff Lowery
    • Re: many-to-many, John Cowan
• many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: many-to-many, Uche Ogbuji
    • Re: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: many-to-many, Miles Sabin
    • And do the other things. Was: many-to-many, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: And do the other things. Was: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: many-to-many, Joe English
    • Re: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: many-to-many, Rich Salz
      • Re: many-to-many, Miles Sabin
      • Re: many-to-many, Mark Baker
      • Re: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: many-to-many, Seairth Jacobs
      • Re: many-to-many, John Cowan
      • Re: many-to-many, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: many-to-many, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
      • Re: many-to-many, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: many-to-many, John Cowan
      • Re: many-to-many, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: many-to-many, John Cowan
      • Re: many-to-many, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: many-to-many, John Cowan
      • Re: many-to-many, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: many-to-many, Jonathan Borden
      • RE: many-to-many, Mike Fitzgerald
      • Re: many-to-many, Tim Bray
      • Re: many-to-many, John Cowan
      • Re: many-to-many, Tim Bray
      • Re: many-to-many, John Cowan
      • Roles and functions [was: many-to-many], W. E. Perry
      • Re: Roles and functions [was: many-to-many], John Cowan
      • Re: Roles and functions [was: many-to-many], Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: many-to-many, Jeff Rafter
      • Re: many-to-many, Mike Plusch
      • Re: many-to-many, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: many-to-many, Jeff Rafter
      • Re: many-to-many, John Cowan
      • Re: many-to-many, Joe English
      • Re: many-to-many, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: many-to-many, Rich Salz
      • Re: many-to-many, John Cowan
    • Re: many-to-many, Miles Sabin
  • Re: many-to-many, Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Use of ID attribute types., Rodriguez, Sergio
  • Re: Use of ID attribute types., Henry S. Thompson
• RE: Duplicate namespace prefixes, Dare Obasanjo
• Duplicate namespace prefixes, Morcom, Harvey
• Dumb question about XML chars vs. Unicode, Matt Gushee