• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: many-to-many
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 14:21:29 -0500
• In-reply-to: <3E34263E.6070100@t...>

tbray@t... (Tim Bray) writes:
>Agreed.  We're talking best practices here.  And we are learning how to 
>design URI spaces for longevity (hint: put dates in the URIs).  There 
>are grounds for optimism... -Tim

Putting dates in URIs is great if you need the date pinned down.  It
makes creating more general pointers into changing documents (the W3C
Process Document, for instance, whose fragments always lurk in date
stamped files) into a real nuisance.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: many-to-many
• Next by Date: Re: many-to-many
• Previous by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Next by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread