• To: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• Subject: Re: many-to-many
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 10:17:34 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200301260859.45551.miles@m...>
• References: <r01050400-1023-E55A32F630AE11D78F1A0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> <3E333A3A.6030900@t...> <200301260859.45551.miles@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

Miles Sabin wrote:

>>Really?  I can't agree.  The online publishers who are technically
>>competent, as well as the emerging community of webloggers, really do
>>have a culture of taking care of their URI space.  This is a Good
>>Thing and should be encouraged.   -Tim
>
...

> At the risk of stating the obvious, the only constant on the web is 
> change. An "axiom" which states the opposite is just plain daft.

Agreed.  We're talking best practices here.  And we are learning how to 
design URI spaces for longevity (hint: put dates in the URIs).  There 
are grounds for optimism... -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• References:
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: many-to-many
• Next by Date: Re: many-to-many
• Previous by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Next by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread