Tim Bray wrote, > Simon St.Laurent wrote: > > "Cool URIs don't change" is a bad joke > > Really? I can't agree. The online publishers who are technically > competent, as well as the emerging community of webloggers, really do > have a culture of taking care of their URI space. This is a Good > Thing and should be encouraged. -Tim Really. Are you really saying that before someone can publish something on the web they have to build a site ontology that's flexible enough to cope with all conceivable future eventualities? That's so counter to actual practice (and so inimical to "Joe Homepage") that I have a tough time understanding how anyone could seriously suggest it. I agree that as a rough and ready principle it's a Good Thing to design a web system in a way which accomodates change without serious disruption. But this has much the same force as the old software design maxim "Design in the future tense". And it's equally defeasible: it has to be weighed against the costs of upfront over-design and the benefits of subsequent refactoring. At the risk of stating the obvious, the only constant on the web is change. An "axiom" which states the opposite is just plain daft. Cheers, Miles
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format