• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: many-to-many
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 14:48:05 -0500
• In-reply-to: <20030126075610.A2173@w...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <r01050400-1023-B3ACAA1130AA11D78F1A0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> <200301260841.25790.miles@m...> <20030126075610.A2173@w...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

On Sunday 26 January 2003 07:56 am, Mark Baker wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 08:41:25AM +0000, Miles Sabin wrote:
> > I disagree. Abstract Resources aren't needed for HTTP caching. Nothing
> > would break if you thought of it as operating in terms of entities with
> > URIs telling a cache where to go to get a fresh entity when the current
> > one is stale.
>
> Try to explain the role of the HTTP Vary header, without saying
> "resource", "thing", "that which a URI identifies", or the equivalent.

Why was HTTP Vary put into the spec in?

• References:
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: many-to-many
• Next by Date: Re: many-to-many
• Previous by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Next by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread