On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 05:38:55PM +0000, Miles Sabin wrote: > So, according to you "resource" is just another way of saying "thing"? Right. > Strange ... I don't think that's quite Roy's position. In fact I'm sure > I recall him arguing quite vigorously against exactly that line. That would surprise me. I'm certain he believes this, though I can't, at the moment, find any words of his that say exactly this. > Whatever, you're welcome to Resource and Representation, and as far as > I'm concerned you're free to use them anyway you see fit. I'm even > happy for you to try to view whatever I say through REST-tinted > spectacles. As I said in an earlier response to Tim, one of the nice > things about the "REST is just one view among many" attitude is that it > just doesn't matter any more. You do your thing and I'll do mine. I respect that, because I don't know for certain that there isn't another model out there that isn't just as general as the REST model. I just have yet to see one, which is why I have a hunch that any model which is as general as the REST model, is equivalent to the REST model. MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format