Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 05:38:55PM +0000, Miles Sabin wrote: > So, according to you "resource" is just another way of saying "thing"? Right. > Strange ... I don't think that's quite Roy's position. In fact I'm sure > I recall him arguing quite vigorously against exactly that line. That would surprise me. I'm certain he believes this, though I can't, at the moment, find any words of his that say exactly this. > Whatever, you're welcome to Resource and Representation, and as far as > I'm concerned you're free to use them anyway you see fit. I'm even > happy for you to try to view whatever I say through REST-tinted > spectacles. As I said in an earlier response to Tim, one of the nice > things about the "REST is just one view among many" attitude is that it > just doesn't matter any more. You do your thing and I'll do mine. I respect that, because I don't know for certain that there isn't another model out there that isn't just as general as the REST model. I just have yet to see one, which is why I have a hunch that any model which is as general as the REST model, is equivalent to the REST model. MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis
|
