• To: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• Subject: Re: many-to-many
• From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
• Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 11:54:17 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200301261324.54123.miles@m...>; from miles@m... on Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:26:30PM +0000
• References: <r01050400-1023-B3ACAA1130AA11D78F1A0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> <200301260841.25790.miles@m...> <20030126075610.A2173@w...> <200301261324.54123.miles@m...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:26:30PM +0000, Miles Sabin wrote:
> Of course, a variation implies a variation on _something_. But it 
> doesn't follow that that something is an abstract resource in the REST 
> sense.

Yes, it does follow.  That's exactly my point.  If it's *something*
then it's a resource.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• References:
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: many-to-many
• Next by Date: Re: many-to-many
• Previous by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Next by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread