• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: subsetting XML
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:28:22 -0500

I posted this to xmlhack, but it seems like a development that everyone
on xml-dev might want to be aware of:

TAG discussion of XML subsets
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0178.html

Norm Walsh describes "thoughts about what an XML subset should look
like", concluding that the subset "must be backwards compatible with XML
1.1" and "must define a language that excludes DTD declarations".


It sounds like it's early yet, but this is probably a thread worth
watching, participating, and discussing, especially while it's in the
public TAG area and not yet in the member-only XML Core.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Prev by Date: RE: Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" m ean?
• Next by Date: Re: Adam Bosworth Article - what does "directaccess" mean?
• Previous by thread: RE: Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" m ean?
• Next by thread: more patent fun
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread