• To: xml-dev@l..., "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: RE: Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: more pate nt fun
• From: "John Evdemon" <jevdemon@a...>
• Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 13:06:39 -0500
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACE4D@h...>
• Priority: normal

On 23 Jan 2003 at 10:45, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> 
> It is time for organizations to begin to talk to
> candidates for high office about real patent reform,
> what is required and what it will take to get it. 
> 
Not nearly enough.  This is another illustration of the 
need for tort reform, although I doubt we see this happen 
anytime soon (how likely is it that a bunch of lawyers will 
vote for tort or even patent reform??)

• References:
  • RE: Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: more pate nt fun
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: more pate nt fun
• Next by Date: RE: Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: more pate nt fun
• Previous by thread: RE: Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: more pate nt fun
• Next by thread: RE: Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: more pate nt fun
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread