• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: namespace URI references
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:34:04 -0500
• In-reply-to: <07ea01c2bccc$20f56aa0$af00a8c0@jmg>

jgreif@a... (Jeff Greif) writes:
>I think I've seen some that use an empty fragment, probably to
>discourage somebody from dereferencing the namespace URI, e.g.
>http://foo.com/bar# .  I also have a vague memory about reading a
>suggestion somewhere that this be done.

Dereferencing http://simonstl.com/ns/fragments/# produces identical
results to dereferencing http://simonstl.com/ns/fragments/ .  

I wonder how they thought that would discourage anyone?
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • Re: namespace URI references
    • From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: namespace URI references
• Next by Date: RE: Contained XML tag won't display
• Previous by thread: Re: namespace URI references
• Next by thread: RE: Contained XML tag won't display
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread