|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: many-to-many
> Uche Ogbuji scripsit: > > I'm certainly not going to put myself through a model > > as complex as that of TM,. I just can't find that it's demonstrably > > necessary. > > I agree. But I think RDF needs to adopt certain TM insights. Quite fair. Just to be clear that my reactions aren't pure technological, ah, mulishness, I have long advocated that RDF adopt the idea of scopes from TM. TM is fundamentally very sound, from what I can gather, but I also gather that in many ways it's overkill. There's another feature of TM I've thought RDF should pick up, but I forget it now. Also, I think that owl:sameIndividualAs might have been inspired by TM, since the last time I remember discussion of standard assertion of the equivalence of individuals, the key players were not keen on the idea. -- Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc. http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com The open office file format - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/librar y/x-think15/ Python Generators + DOM - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/01/08/py-xml.html 4Suite Repository Features - https://www6.software.ibm.com/reg/devworks/dw-x4su ite5-i/ XML class warfare - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=6965
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








