• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Which next step for examplotron?
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:19:03 +1100
• References: <1042882589.11562.1478.camel@ibook>

From: "Eric van der Vlist" <vdv@d...>

> I need some feedback concerning future directions for examplotron
> (http://examplotron.org/)...

My suggestion: release an implementation using a stock-standard XSLT rather
than SAXON-specific extensions (that I think you currently use).  

I would have been happy to have offered it with our Validator and Markup 
Editor products, but for this.   I don't think it is features that holds Examplotron back, 
it is implementations!

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
Topologi

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Which next step for examplotron?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • Which next step for examplotron?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: 1-to-many HTML links, prototyped
• Next by Date: Re: Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: more pate nt fun
• Previous by thread: Which next step for examplotron?
• Next by thread: Re: Which next step for examplotron?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread