RE: Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: more pate nt fun
Yep. I am in total agreement with that except they specify technologies and call those standards. It's a quibble but one I have to repeat. I'm a lot happier when private consortia specify technologies and then these technologies by adoption become de facto standards. len From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@d...] Yes, some technologies might not be brought forward in RF that would be brought forward in RAND. Given the success of the Web so far, I can live with that. There's something to be said for an organization that specifies standards that can be implemented and sold by anyone. The RAND folks can create their own consortia as they've done in the past; they don't need the W3C to promulgate their IP revenue streams.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format