RE: ConciseXML syntax --> no thank u!
Greetings, XML-DEV. This is not an immprovement of XML 1.0, this is a SGML subset with some wierd compatibility notions with XML... Why bother to proposed another markup language? XML was intendend to be a much simple subset of SGML and to be interoperable with HTML. In my first perception, "ConciseXML" is not interoperable like XML... By the way, why not include the AND connectors of the SGML/DTD to the structure of "ConciseXML"? Therefore it wouldn't be even closer to XML. Sergio Rodríguez. CANELLA, S. A. C.A. / GT.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format